Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

I. Jinja ko bengi Text in kanbun (annotated)

door: W.J. Boot en M.M.E. Buijnsters op: 14 januari 2016

Today, the results of the ‘Jinja kō bengi’ research project by W.J. Boot and M.M.E. Buijnsters have been made public on our website under the section “Specialist; Scholarly Publications”. All together, these results amount to seven pdf’s which consist of an annotated rendering of the original text of Jinja kō bengi 神社考辨疑(1686), and of an annotated transliteration in Japanese and translation in English of this Early Modern Buddhist-Confucian polemic. Jinja kō bengi by the Shingon priest Jakuhon 寂本 (1631-1701) should be considered as an early Buddhist reply to one of, if not the most influential Confucian criticisms of Buddhism in the early seventeenth century: Honchō jinja kō 本朝神社考 by Hayashi Razan 林羅山 (1583-1657). In addition to these documents, the authors have added an annotated translation of the preface of Razan’s Honchō jinja kō, a biographical portrait of both Jakuhon and Hayashi Razan, and, finally, an extensive bibliography of all sources used.